Author Guidelines

Welcome to the Journal of Educational Innovations and Practices (JEIP). JEIP is dedicated to publishing high-quality research that bridges the gap between educational theory and practice through innovative methodologies. We aim to serve as a vital platform for researchers, educators, and policymakers by offering scalable, evidence-based solutions.

To ensure a smooth review process and minimize the risk of desk rejection, please follow this guide strictly. This manual includes specific criteria, concrete examples of strong vs. weak writing, and mandatory requirements for your submission.

1. Pre-Submission Checklist

Before submitting your manuscript, please ensure you have the following four separate files ready. Failure to provide these files or adhere to anonymity rules will result in the submission being returned.

  • ✅ File 1: Title Page (Identifiable)
    Must include the full title, all author names, affiliations, ORCID IDs, corresponding author contact details, acknowledgments, and ALL declarations (Ethics, AI, Funding, etc.). (See Section 6)
  • ✅ File 2: Blinded Manuscript (Anonymous)
    This is the file sent to reviewers. It must contain the Title, Abstract, Keywords, Main Text, References, and Tables/Figures.
    CRITICAL: Remove all author names, affiliations, e-mail addresses, and identifying acknowledgments from this file. Ensure file properties (metadata) are also cleared.
  • ✅ File 3: Copyright & License Agreement
    Must be completed/signed as required by JEIP. For licensing and reuse terms, see Rights & Permissions.
  • ✅ File 4: Similarity Report
    A PDF export from iThenticate or Turnitin. The overall similarity index must be < 25% (excluding bibliography/references). Matches of less than 1% can be disregarded.

2. Article Types & Scope

JEIP publishes innovative research across all levels of education (K-12 to Higher Education). We primarily accept:

  • Research Articles: Original empirical studies (quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods) presenting novel findings. Length: 6,000–12,000 words.
  • Review Articles: Systematic reviews or meta-analyses that critically synthesize existing literature to offer new insights. Length: 6,000–12,000 words.

Note: We prioritize studies focusing on innovation (e.g., AI, AR/VR, Learning Analytics) and practical application.

3. General Formatting Rules

  • File Format: Microsoft Word (.docx).
  • Font: Standard font (e.g., Times New Roman 12pt or Arial 11pt).
  • Spacing: Double-spaced throughout the entire document.
  • Margins: 2.5 cm (1 inch) on all sides.
  • Page Numbers: Required (bottom right corner).
  • Line Numbers: Recommended to facilitate the review process.
  • Headings: Use clear, numbered headings (1. Introduction, 2. Literature Review, etc.).

Reference Style: APA 7th Edition

JEIP strictly adheres to the APA 7th Edition standards.

  • In-text citations: (Author, Year) or Author (Year).
  • Reference List: Alphabetical order, hanging indent.
  • DOIs: Must be included where available (format: https://doi.org/xxxx).
  • Tables/Figures: Captions must follow APA 7.

4. File Preparation Guide

A. Title Page (File 1)

Since the main manuscript is blinded, this file is the only place for author details. It must contain:

  1. Manuscript Title: Full title.
  2. Author Details: Full name, Affiliation (Department, Faculty, University, City, Country), E-mail, and ORCID ID for every author.
  3. Corresponding Author: Clearly marked, with full postal address and phone number (if applicable).
  4. Declarations: Include all mandatory statements here (see Section 6).
  5. Acknowledgments: Thank individuals or institutions here (do not include in blinded file).

B. Blinded Manuscript (File 2)

Prepare this file for double-blind review:

  • Anonymize Authors: Remove names from below the title.
  • Blinding Citations: If citing your own previous work, use (Author, Year) in text and reference list where needed for anonymization.
  • Blinding Ethics/Locations: Do not name the specific university, committee, school, or city. Use generic statements (details can be provided after acceptance if required).
  • Structure: Title, Abstract, Keywords, Main Text, References, and (if applicable) Tables/Figures/Appendices.

5. Detailed Manuscript Structure

Please structure your manuscript according to the following guide. Examples of strong vs. weak content are provided to support quality.

A. Title

Criteria: Concise, clear, and reflective of the content. Must reflect JEIP's focus on Innovation and Practice. Avoid unnecessary words.

❌ Weak Title: “A Study on Gamification in Education”
(Critique: Too general. Which level? Which context? What result?)

❌ Better Title: “The Effect of Gamification on Middle School Students' Motivation”
(Critique: Better, but lacks the specific innovation emphasis.)

✅ Strong Title for JEIP: “The Effect of Augmented Reality (AR) Supported Gamification Practices on Academic Achievement and Critical Thinking Skills in Middle School Science Learning”
(Strengths: Specifies innovation, context, and key outcomes.)

B. Abstract

Format: Structured abstract (200–250 words). Must include: Purpose, Method, Findings, Conclusion.

Sentence Templates for a Strong Abstract

  • Purpose: “The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of [Innovative Practice/Technology] on [Measured Variable] of [Participant Group]…”
  • Method: “The study employed a [Research Design]. Data were collected from [N] via [Tools]…”
  • Findings: “Findings revealed that [key result] (p < .05)…”
  • Conclusion: “In conclusion, [innovation] was effective for enhancing [outcome] and offers implications for [stakeholders]…”

C. Keywords

Provide 4–6 specific keywords for indexing.

  • ❌ Weak: Education, Technology, Students (Too broad).
  • ✅ Strong: Augmented Reality (AR), Gamification, Science Education, Critical Thinking, STEM.

D. Introduction

This section must logically flow through the following elements:

  1. Broad Context: Current state of the field.
  2. Specific Problem: What is the issue?
  3. The Gap: What does existing literature lack?
  4. Originality & Purpose: How does this study fill that gap?
  5. Research Questions: Clear and answerable.

E. Literature Review / Theoretical Framework

Synthesis vs. Listing: Do not list studies one-by-one. Instead, synthesize under themes.

✅ Strong synthesis example: “Studies on AR consistently demonstrate positive effects on motivation (Author A, 2020; Author B, 2021). However, most fail to address higher-order cognitive skills (Author C, 2022)…”

F. Methodology

This section must be detailed enough to allow replication. Include the following:

  • Research Design: Justify your design.
  • Participants: Describe sampling and demographics without identifying institution/school.
  • Instruments: Provide evidence of validity and reliability.
  • Analysis: Explain procedures clearly.
  • Ethics: State that ethics approval and informed consent were obtained (keep details anonymized in blinded file).

G. Findings

Present results objectively. Do not interpret results here; save interpretation for Discussion.

✅ Quantitative example: “Independent samples t-test indicated that the AR group (M = 85.2) scored significantly higher than the control group (M = 72.1), t(98) = 15.2, p < .001.”

✅ Qualitative example: “Thematic analysis revealed the theme ‘Increased Engagement’. Student S12 stated: ‘…’”

H. Discussion & Conclusion

  • Interpretation: Explain why results occurred; link to theory/framework.
  • Comparison: Contrast with prior literature.
  • Conclusion: Summarize contributions concisely; do not add new data.

I. Practical Implications

Crucial for JEIP: Provide actionable suggestions for practitioners and decision-makers.

✅ Example: “School administrators should budget for teacher professional development on pedagogical strategies as much as for hardware procurement.”

J. Limitations and Future Directions

Report limitations transparently (sample, context, instruments). Suggest future research that addresses these limitations.

6. Mandatory Declarations (Title Page Only)

Include the following statements in your Title Page file. Do not include them in the blinded manuscript. For privacy-related information, see Privacy Statement.

1. Funding

Example: “This work was supported by [Funder Name] under Grant No: [XXXX].” OR “This research received no specific grant.”

2. Conflict of Interest

Example: “The authors declare no competing interests.”

3. Ethics Committee Approval

Example: “Ethical approval was obtained from [Institution Name] (Date: DD.MM.YYYY, Decision No: XXXX).”

4. Author Contributions

Example: “Conceptualization: Author A, Author B. Methodology: Author A. Data Analysis: Author B. Writing – Original Draft: Author A.”

5. Data Availability Statement

Example: “Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.”

6. AI Usage Declaration

Option A (Used): “During the preparation of this work, the author(s) used [Tool Name] to [Reason]. After using this tool, the author(s) reviewed and edited the content and take full responsibility for the content.”

Option B (Not Used): “No AI tools were used in this study.”

7. Review & Publication Process

JEIP follows a rigorous and transparent process:

  1. Submission: Author uploads files.
  2. Initial Check: Format/scope check and similarity screening. Manuscripts with similarity > 25% may be rejected.
  3. Editor Assignment: A Section Editor is assigned.
  4. Peer Review: Double-blind review by at least two independent reviewers.
  5. Decision: Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, or Reject.
  6. Revision: Revised manuscript + Response to Reviewers (deadline: 30 days).
  7. Production: Copy-editing and proofreading.
  8. Publication: Continuous publication (Online First).

For ethical rules, please see Editorial Policies.

8. Fees & Language Editing

No Fees (Diamond Open Access)

JEIP charges no submission fees and no Article Processing Charges (APCs). Publishing is completely free.

Language Editing

Manuscripts must be in clear, academic English. Poor language may lead to desk rejection regardless of scientific merit. Professional language editing is strongly recommended before submission. JEIP does not provide editing services.

Ready to Submit?

If you have prepared your files according to these guidelines, proceed to our online system.

Submit Your Manuscript

For reuse, licensing, and third-party material rules, please consult Rights & Permissions. For privacy and data handling information, see Privacy Statement. For general inquiries, use the Contact page.